Capitalism, socialism, and communism are three key concepts in social studies, with complex definitions and complicated histories. Explaining these concepts in the classroom is muddled even more by how these words are used in modern media. The meaning is often obscured by political alliances and deliberate attempts to mislead.
The words capitalism, socialism, and communism describe different economic systems. A simple and effective way to present these key concepts in the classroom is through the economic continuum illustrated by the chart below. Students are much more likely to grasp the key differences if these concepts are first presented separate from political systems such as autocracy, theocracy, or democracy.
Capitalism, socialism, and communism are also easier to understand and remember when the histories of the words are explored.
Photo: iStock by Getty Images
Economic Terms Defined
Capitalism and socialism first came into use in the 1830s. Capitalism described an economic system in which wealth (or capital, another word for wealth) was owned by individuals for their personal profit. The British policy of government regulation of trade called mercantilism was being abandoned by the 1830s, and the free market (not the government) determined the production and distribution of goods. The word capitalism was a product of the changing economy of Great Britain during the Industrial Revolution.
The word socialism also began to be used in the 1830s, to describe a system different from capitalism. Socialism held that groups of people should own and regulate the economy for the benefit of all the members, not just a few. Early nineteenth-century socialists were often disturbed by the economic and social changes caused by the Industrial Revolution. In the first half of the nineteenth century, socialist ideals inspired utopian communities such as the transcendentalists’ Brook Farm, Robert Owen’s New Harmony, and the Oneida Community. An even older ideal of Christian socialism described in the Bible inspired religious socialist communities such as the Shakers, Rappites, Amana Colonies, and Hutterites. Even the term social studies alludes to how a community or wider society benefits from shared knowledge.
Communism was first a French word, coined in the 1840s, to describe a system of collective ownership in which individuals did not own private property and worked together for the benefit of all community members. This new French word described ideals similar to the English concept of socialism and derived from the word common, meaning something is free or open to everyone.
The word communism was adopted by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels in the 1850s to describe their ideology of opposing industrial capitalism. Marxist communism sought the overthrow of governments supporting a capitalist economy. By 1918, communism was the ideology of Russia’s Bolshevik Revolution and was associated with a single authoritarian political party. The combined economic and political ideology of modern communism was implemented in the Soviet Union (1922), the People’s Republic of China (1949), North Korea (1948), North Vietnam (1945), and Cuba (1965).
Photo: iStock by Getty Images
Modern Day Implications
Today, the historical words capitalism, socialism, and communism do not fully capture the economic systems of nations. New words are also used to describe economic systems: free market system; mixed economy; command economy. But these modern words can still lead to confusion because, in reality, modern nations are not purely free market capitalist or purely command/communist. In recent years, communist China and Cuba have loosened economic restrictions and allowed free market activities. On the other hand, the United States regulates many aspects of its economy and owns and manages very “socialist” enterprises such as public schools, public transportation, and public libraries.
In other words, communism, socialism, and capitalism are a continuum, with modern national economics falling somewhere in the middle, or mixed, zone. In American politics, those aligned to the right of the political spectrum are more likely to support free market policies, and those to the left are more likely to support government intervention in the economy. Recent polls by the Pew Research Center demonstrate how the political alliances of Americans influence perceptions of these words.
Ultimately, nations and citizens of nations must decide how much government regulation of the economy is appropriate. Therefore, a clear understanding of the historical developments, meaning, political associations, and synonyms of these three words is essential in social studies.
Economic Systems |
|||
| Communism | Socialism | Capitalism | |
| Government owns/regulates all aspects of the economy. | Government owns/regulates some parts of the economy for the benefit of the whole nation;
and Individuals and private businesses also their own make their own economic decisions, keeping the profits and accepting the losses. |
Individuals and private businesses own everything and make economic decisions free from government regulation, keeping the profits and accepting the losses without intervention. | |
| Also known as:
Command Economy |
Also known as:
Mixed economy |
Also known as: Free Market Economy or Free Enterprise |
|
| Usually aligned to the political left | Usually aligned to the political right | ||
Active Classroom can aid your classroom with hundreds of activities about Economics
Access a free trial and start engaging students today
Cynthia W. Resor is a social studies education professor and former middle and high school social studies teacher. Her dream job? Time-travel tour guide. But until she discovers the secret of time travel, she writes about the past in her blog, Primary Source Bazaar. Her three books on teaching social history themes feature essential questions and primary sources: Discovering Quacks, Utopias, and Cemeteries: Modern Lessons from Historical Themes; Investigating Family, Food, and Housing Themes in Social Studies and Exploring Vacation and Etiquette Themes in Social Studies.
Thank you for this article. I greatly enjoyed reading it. I am going to look for books by Cynthia W Resor. I would like to learn more. I usually read about science and mathematics.
I am trying to recall an old saying that used a cow and her milk to show how each was distributed via 5 various “isms”. ie. a capitalist sells the milk, keeps the milk and the profit; a communist does’t own the cow, mills the cow and earns a wage.
Can you help me? I think I first read it in the ‘70’s. I would like to pass it on to my friends and family. Thank you, Steve Chase. shchase@msn. com
Socialism: You have two cows.
Give one cow to your neighbor.
Communism: You have two cows. Give both cows to the government, and they might give you some of the milk.
Fascism: You have two cows. You give all of the milk to the government, and the government sells it.
Nazism: You have two cows. The government shoots you and takes both cows.
Anarchism: You have two cows. Keep both of the cows, shoot the government agent and steal another cow.
Capitalism: You have two cows.
Sell one cow and buy a bull.
Thank you for this very clear and concise explanation. I searched through many sites before landing on yours and finally found the answers I was looking for.
this was a great way to describe the difference between these 3 complicated words that were for me. thank you so much!
As a lower-middle class (naturally born) American citizen, with a private home and two cars, level ‘B’ grade cards throughout my schooling, zero inherited wealth, who successfully raised 4 wonderful children to adulthood, I would have but one question: Under what economic system would I have had more personal wealth, personal freedom and personal happiness than Capitalism?